Wednesday, September 15, 2004

Memos: Fake Contents: ?

If the memos are fraudulent, then why was the Bush campaign silent on the matter for so long? Can it be because Bush wasn't sure if they were fake or not?

The secretary of the alleged author of the memos says that they reflect what he was saying around the office (probably with language a good deal more colorful) about the spoiled rich boys in the Champagne Squadron generally and young George specifically.

The idea of fake documents with geniune contents is a bit head-spinning, but hey.

Meanwhile, the more important question of whether the little weasel deserves your vote remains open. At least, for some people it's still open.

No comments: